Friendly Observer
By Arthur Keefe
UK lessons
The news in the UK has been full of a historic
handshake between the Queen and the man who used to command the IRA in Northern
Ireland (NI). He is now deputy prime minister in the elected NI assembly, which
has devolved responsibility for domestic affairs within the UK.
His “army” in 1979 murdered the Queen’s Cousin, Earl
Mountbatten (who was the last British Governor in India before independence),
and they are still dedicated to reuniting NI with the Republic of Ireland and
ending the Queen’s rule over that part of Ireland.
Not too old to be beautiful, the British Queen Elizabeth greets her supporters. Photo source: http://www.qub.ac.uk |
The difference now is that nearly all save a few dissident IRA
members, have given up the armed struggle in favour of democratic means.
The Peace process has taken many years. The issue was
essentially that the minority Catholic population want a united Ireland,
whereas the majority Protestants want to remain within the UK.The division is
not really one of religion, but of tribalism.
The Catholics are descended from the early population, whereas
the Protestants are the descendants of migrant workers who 400 years ago were
taken from Scotland by the English to work the land.The sectarian divide has
been sustained by largely separate neighbourhoods, by separate schools, and
separate workplaces. Few Catholics joined the Police or the Army, allowing them
to be seen as instruments of British oppression.The creation of two separate
States ,a Republic in the South, and a British Province in the North, only
occurred in 1921 when the South managed to achieve independence from Britain
through an armed uprising.
Today, the Republic has little interest in incorporating the
troublesome North, although there is a lot of cross border co-operation on
domestic issues, and there are no formalities for cross border travel.
The British equally see the North as troublesome, and would not
oppose a united Ireland.The official line is that they will respect the wishes
of the majority, which is currently to remain in the UK. However, with the
higher Catholic birthrate, a majority may vote the other way in 20 or 30 years.
The handshake was not the first symbol of changing times. The
first was when the leaders of both communities, encouraged by President
Clinton, and brokered by Tony Blair (then the UK PM), sat down together to form
a power sharing elected Assembly. Despite a bumpy ride, this arrangement has
held.
The next symbol was the Queen being invited to the Republic to
meet the Irish President, the first such visit for hundreds of years. The
British record of rule in Ireland was horrific, from Cromwell until the last
century. The Queen’s visit and her warm welcome was a sign of a changed
relationship there, too.
Are there lessons for the seperatist forces in Mindanao?
The problems are similar. A religious divide based on heritage
rather than theology; an indigenous population surrounded by more recent
settlers; an armed struggle going nowhere and sapping energy from a dispirited
population.; a feeling of “belonging South” rather than to the colonial power
in Manila.
However, differences are also apparent. There is no obvious neighbour
to join with, and independence is hardly viable, despite a population three
times that of the whole of Ireland. There is no EU which for Ireland makes
borders permeable.
The problems of Ireland and Mindanao are similar, but the
solutions need to be different.
A Federal structure such as is being negotiated at present
could work, but only with substantial devolution of power, much more than a
strengthened Local Government.
In the UK, we also
have a move for Scotland to be fully independent. A referendum will be held in
2 years time, although at present this move has only about 30%support. Unlike
both Ireland and the Philippines, not a shot has been fired in a campaign being
conducted entirely democratically by debate and votes. Perhaps that is where
the lesson for both the UK and the Philippines lies.
No comments:
Post a Comment